Fictional Empathy

The last post on August 13, 2026, “Sin Boldly,” concerned conservative attacks on empathy and discussed Reading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir in Books (2003), where the author Azar Nafisi indicates that reading literature increases empathy. I wondered if that was true. A brief search found “Does Reading Fiction Make Us Better People” by Claudia Hammond on the BBC website of June 2, 2019. (https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190523-does-reading-fiction-make-us-better-people)

Hammond discusses research on the hard-to-study issue. (My nephew did his PhD thesis in education on the subject. His results were inconclusive.) Her review indicates that reading fiction does increase empathy and perhaps social cognition, the skill at working out what others are thinking and feeling. She says that other reading may also increase empathy but says that with fiction “we have access to the character’s interior world in a way we normally do not with journalism, and we are more likely to willingly suspend disbelief without questioning the veracity of what people are saying. Finally, novels allow us to do something that is hard to do in our own lives, which is to view a character’s life over many years.”

Hammond summarizes, “So the research shows that perhaps reading fiction does make people behave better.” She concludes, “It’s time to lose the stereotype of the shy bookworm whose nose is always in a book because they find it difficult to deal with real people. In fact, these bookworms might be better than everyone else at understanding human beings.”

This reminds me of advice I received early in my legal career when an attorney, a generation older than the group of newbie bar members he was talking with, said, “If you want to be a trial lawyer, read a novel a week.” I was not the only listener who looked quizzical. He continued, “To be good at trials you have to understand human nature, and the best way to learn human nature is to read good novels.” He repeated, “Read a novel a week.” Since he had a reputation as a stellar trial attorney, I registered his remark. (See post of August 1, 2018, “Read A Novel a Week.”)

I have read fiction with a varying frequency throughout my life. Perhaps it has increased my empathy but perhaps not enough. For example, I am not proud that in scanning the obituaries I feel some satisfaction when I find that a vegan has died of a liver ailment

And on the other hand, Sigrid Nunez says in The Friend, “If reading really does increase empathy, as we are constantly being told that it does, it appears that writing takes some away.” Perhaps it is time to leave the keyboard.

Snippets

Polls divide the public in many ways by separating us by liberal or conservative; political party; age; income; gender; gun ownership; religion; geography; favorite sport; education; race and ethnic group; and much more. However, I haven’t seen the breakdown by other factors that I think might be illuminating. Such as: Do you live in a gated community? Do you read books?

“It cannot possibly be true, can it, the story about Toscanini losing patience during a rehearsal with a soprano, grabbing her large breasts and crying, ‘If only these were brains!’” Sigrid Nunez, What Are You Going Through (Thanks SN.)

The battling bishops. That sounds as if it is an informal name for the American Roman Catholic hierarchy who want to deny some politicians communion. (Do those bishops seek to deny communion to those who support the death penalty? If so, it doesn’t seem to get reported in the press.) The “Battling Bishops,” however, is the nickname of the sports teams for North Carolina Wesleyan College. I thought that this was an amusing, slightly sacrilegious, unique name for a Methodist institution, but then I learned that Ohio Wesleyan teams are also the Battling Bishops.

The present version of the Roman Catholic battling bishops makes me think back to when John Kennedy was running for president. Many prominent Protestants opposed his candidacy. They said that the Catholic hierarchy would dictate policies of a Catholic president, and this would violate our country’s bedrock principle of separation of church and state. Now it seems as if the Catholic bishops are doing something very much like what was feared when Kennedy ran, but I have seen no Protestant outrage at the assault on a fundamental building block of this country. I cannot be surprised. Death and hypocrisy are inevitable.

“Only the little people pay taxes.” Leona Hemsley. (And perhaps another hotelier.)

Sign held by a spectator at the New York City Marathon: Jack, run fast. My water broke.

Former President Obama spoke eloquently at the Glasgow climate summit in favor of combating global warming. Was former president Trump given the opportunity to address the leaders to tell them global warming is only a Chinese hoax?

Got any Aaron Rodgers jokes for this boyhood Green Bay Packer fan?

Big Bird announces an upcoming vaccination. Ted Cruz leaps into a decisive action and denounces the puppet’s words as government propaganda. Perhaps it is beyond Cruz to recognize that Big Bird has always been a propagandist—of innocence, curiosity, and niceness, but perhaps these are qualities that Cruz does not care about. And then an even less likeable politician than Cruz (I know, I know, that is hard to believe) from the Arizona legislature labels Big Bird a communist. I wish I were making this up.